FHSU Professor goes crazy!

bg0308 wrote:

Even though the girl started the whole thing, there are many ways to defend yourself without being such a jackass.

There were many times in my previous job as a front desk attendant when people would bitch and complain. If I acted like he did trying to get a point across I would have been fired in a heart beat.

IMO: I don't care what type of job one has or the status one carries if someone acts like he does they should be fired.

DITTO !!!!

I have a friend I visit with and we have been discussing the wild bill antics. He thinks that nothing will happen as any type of punishment because that type of behavior is a standard among the academic world and it is considered the norm. He also he thinks that wild bills
"prestige" as an educator will protect him from any repercussions. If my friend is correct about that, I think we as a society should be outraged that conduct like this is tolerated and in many cases awarded for being " a cutting edge educator and innovator". I think what that lady he mooned should have done was kicked him square on then ass and knocked him over. We need to be better than what was displayed on that video. We need to be able to make a point in an intelligent and civilized way and not throw a tantrum like a 3 year old. Sadly though, most likely nothing will be done as a reprimand, but if anything is done at all, it wil be a light slap on the wrist and he will be told to behave "wink wink" himself and when that spotlight is off the subject he will be patted on the back and told "Good job" so as to not offend his oversized ego. What a prima donna...........

and of cousre now that this has come to light, wild bill cannot be reached for comment. I think he should come out of hiding and make a public heartfelt apology for the newsmediia and also post it on Youtube, as well as send written apolozies to everyone that was in the room the day that happened. Stand up like a man and take your lumps and learn something from it. Become a better person because of it.

steinem wrote:

Ratzilla wrote:

luv2cook wrote:

I didnt say anything about the loud mouthed broad in the video because in all honesty, that would have been just as scathing and it would have probably pissed off 95% of the women here so I chose to pass on that one.

I find this comment interesting. I thought they were both a pair of ass clowns in that video, except he was funny and she was just annoying. Is avoiding commentary that might PO your fellow women more important than the truth?

Why would a comment about the "loud mouthed broad" piss off women? ....Women have no license for misbehavior by virture of being born female. Her hysteria was pathetic. Women's standards should be as high as any man's. I think she should well be dealt the same penalties as he, a charge of disorderly conduct as well as conduct unbecoming a college instructor.

Well because my comments probably would not have stopped there and Id have went off into a big anti-feminism rant and Im certain THAT is what would have pissed the women of this board off.

That being said, I agree 100% that the female star of this video should also recieve some sort of ass chewing for her disgraceful behavior that day as well.


On another note, why is it that the Hays Daily Snoooooze has not printed a word on this subject?

Perhaps they know nothing about it. If only they read their own forum.

try todays paper

Thanks roadstar, I was about to say the same.

I suspect it about killed him to make those apologetic remarks.

wild bills blog

http://www.everydaycitizen.com/billshanahan/

LukeTHr wrote:

wild bills blog

http://www.everydaycitizen.com/billshanahan/

It has not been updated much

his photo on there looks like a mug shot

"Master Debaters."

This finally made the Topeka tv news yesterday, and print news today.

just wait till it hits FOX and CNN

LukeTHr wrote:

just wait till it hits FOX and CNN

wife said it was on CNN the other morning. announcer said "take a look at this professor from Kansas !"

this is going to snowball. My friend from Oklahoma saw it on the news and was asking me what's wrong with Hays these days.

link to the site she sent me.

Looks like his "tenure" status is going to give the whole town of Hays a bad name!

suzyr wrote:

This finally made the Topeka tv news yesterday, and print news today.

Kansas City 5 oclock news today!

I would not want to deal with this FHSU Professor in class, in a business, on a field, and not in a Jail!!!

Justoo wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,403781,00.html

So it was her screaming about alleged racism that started this? I'll have to say I've reached the point myself of wanting to moon those who play the race card to get their way.

steinem wrote:

Why would a comment about the "loud mouthed broad" piss off women? ....Women have no license for misbehavior by virture of being born female. Her hysteria was pathetic. Women's standards should be as high as any man's. I think she should well be dealt the same penalties as he, a charge of disorderly conduct as well as conduct unbecoming a college instructor.

I agree, but I can see why L2C would be reluctant. How many times have I been accused of not liking "strong women" just because I don't like the Hillarcow?

dz724 wrote:

suzyr wrote:

This finally made the Topeka tv news yesterday, and print news today.

Kansas City 5 oclock news today!

Wichita news tonight at 10.

Ratzilla wrote:

steinem wrote:

Why would a comment about the "loud mouthed broad" piss off women? ....Women have no license for misbehavior by virture of being born female. Her hysteria was pathetic. Women's standards should be as high as any man's. I think she should well be dealt the same penalties as he, a charge of disorderly conduct as well as conduct unbecoming a college instructor.

I agree, but I can see why L2C would be reluctant. How many times have I been accused of not liking "strong women" just because I don't like the Hillarcow?

...I would simply hope you base your decsion on her politics, not because she's a woman. You can criticize Hill all you want, it doesn't offend me. What I don't understand is why some men think a woman shouldn't have an opinion, do they really want to spend his their life with a doormat? As for L2C and her need to hold back on feminist bashing, I guess she doesn't want to be represented by women in congress on women's issues (did you know insurance doesn't cover birth control but it covers Viagra, go figure) , she wants to work for less pay for doing the same job as her male counterpart and I guess she wouldn't care that she could have never voted had it not been for the early feminists. I have a whole list of freedoms early women fought for that she enjoys, but we're off topic so I'll cease and desist. But as women deserve same rights, again, they should be held to same standard of proper decorum and I'm glad to see the debate instructor that provoked Shanahan is being investigated too. I understand she's playing the race card now. Prejudice doesn't strike me as something Shanahan would be guilty of....

Ratzilla wrote:

So it was her screaming about alleged racism that started this? I'll have to say I've reached the point myself of wanting to moon those who play the race card to get their way.

Actually if this information is to be believed she had a legitimate complaint.

http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=41527

Quote :

It seems each team is allowed to remove one judge out of five from the round. It seems that the beardo's team "struck" this woman because she had rated them poorly during previous rounds where she had judged.

Then, the other team made the argument DURING the debate that striking her was an enforcement of "white privilege." This team then won the debate. After the debate was over, there was some kind of heated exchange among the three remaining judges and one of them left in frustration. Right after that is apparently when this video begins.

I never did discern what exactly the debate was supposed to be about because the thread I found about it was too steeped in nerdy debate jargon.

Lastly, Steinem, Im going to choose to not comment on your post outside of saying the following: While the womens movement helped women it also hurt them a great deal.


Saying anything further on this topic is only going to raise my blood pressure along with yours I suspect.

luv2cook wrote:

Ratzilla wrote:

So it was her screaming about alleged racism that started this? I'll have to say I've reached the point myself of wanting to moon those who play the race card to get their way.

Actually if this information is to be believed she had a legitimate complaint.

http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=41527

Quote :

It seems each team is allowed to remove one judge out of five from the round. It seems that the beardo's team "struck" this woman because she had rated them poorly during previous rounds where she had judged.

Then, the other team made the argument DURING the debate that striking her was an enforcement of "white privilege." This team then won the debate. After the debate was over, there was some kind of heated exchange among the three remaining judges and one of them left in frustration. Right after that is apparently when this video begins.

I never did discern what exactly the debate was supposed to be about because the thread I found about it was too steeped in nerdy debate jargon.

Lastly, Steinem, Im going to choose to not comment on your post outside of saying the following: While the womens movement helped women it also hurt them a great deal.


Saying anything further on this topic is only going to raise my blood pressure along with yours I suspect.

Women belong in the kitchen....














Helping me do the dishes....

nitromaxx98 wrote:

luv2cook wrote:

Ratzilla wrote:

So it was her screaming about alleged racism that started this? I'll have to say I've reached the point myself of wanting to moon those who play the race card to get their way.

Actually if this information is to be believed she had a legitimate complaint.

http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=41527

Quote :

It seems each team is allowed to remove one judge out of five from the round. It seems that the beardo's team "struck" this woman because she had rated them poorly during previous rounds where she had judged.

Then, the other team made the argument DURING the debate that striking her was an enforcement of "white privilege." This team then won the debate. After the debate was over, there was some kind of heated exchange among the three remaining judges and one of them left in frustration. Right after that is apparently when this video begins.

I never did discern what exactly the debate was supposed to be about because the thread I found about it was too steeped in nerdy debate jargon.

Lastly, Steinem, Im going to choose to not comment on your post outside of saying the following: While the womens movement helped women it also hurt them a great deal.


Saying anything further on this topic is only going to raise my blood pressure along with yours I suspect.

Women belong in the kitchen....















































Helping me do the dishes....

Men belong in the bedroom






















giving pleasure to there women

suck up....

slick Im gonna pretend you didn't say that k? k.

nobodysbusiness wrote:

slick Im gonna pretend you didn't say that k? k.

WHY??????????????????

Bare foot and getting me a beer.

steinem wrote:

...I would simply hope you base your decsion on her politics, not because she's a woman. You can criticize Hill all you want, it doesn't offend me. What I don't understand is why some men think a woman shouldn't have an opinion, do they really want to spend his their life with a doormat? As for L2C and her need to hold back on feminist bashing, I guess she doesn't want to be represented by women in congress on women's issues (did you know insurance doesn't cover birth control but it covers Viagra, go figure) , she wants to work for less pay for doing the same job as her male counterpart and I guess she wouldn't care that she could have never voted had it not been for the early feminists. I have a whole list of freedoms early women fought for that she enjoys, but we're off topic so I'll cease and desist. But as women deserve same rights, again, they should be held to same standard of proper decorum and I'm glad to see the debate instructor that provoked Shanahan is being investigated too. I understand she's playing the race card now. Prejudice doesn't strike me as something Shanahan would be guilty of....

I don't have my opinions on Hillary because she's a female. I have them because she's an unpleasant, corrupt, and socialistic one. I'm not going to argue the pros and cons of feminism here either, but I believe the reason viagra would be covered by insurance and not birth control is likely because viagra is a corrective treatment to an involuntary medical problem where pregnancy is usually the result of voluntary activity and can be prevented without medications.

2012, Billary is setting up for, nothing less....

Ratzilla wrote:

steinem wrote:

...I would simply hope you base your decsion on her politics, not because she's a woman. You can criticize Hill all you want, it doesn't offend me. What I don't understand is why some men think a woman shouldn't have an opinion, do they really want to spend his their life with a doormat? As for L2C and her need to hold back on feminist bashing, I guess she doesn't want to be represented by women in congress on women's issues (did you know insurance doesn't cover birth control but it covers Viagra, go figure) , she wants to work for less pay for doing the same job as her male counterpart and I guess she wouldn't care that she could have never voted had it not been for the early feminists. I have a whole list of freedoms early women fought for that she enjoys, but we're off topic so I'll cease and desist. But as women deserve same rights, again, they should be held to same standard of proper decorum and I'm glad to see the debate instructor that provoked Shanahan is being investigated too. I understand she's playing the race card now. Prejudice doesn't strike me as something Shanahan would be guilty of....

I don't have my opinions on Hillary because she's a female. I have them because she's an unpleasant, corrupt, and socialistic one. I'm not going to argue the pros and cons of feminism here either, but I believe the reason viagra would be covered by insurance and not birth control is likely because viagra is a corrective treatment to an involuntary medical problem where pregnancy is usually the result of voluntary activity and can be prevented without medications.

BC pills are used for medical issues other than birthcontrol; It's also used for dysmenorhea, regulating girls with dysfunctional periods, i.e overbleeding and irregular timing....etc, etc. In other words, it is used often for corrective treatment too. But again this is veering off topic....

nitromaxx98 wrote:

suck up....

Suck up?.... nah. He's wise. A man that treats right, gets treated right in return. Amazing what mutual respect will get you. S.Jay, You a real man, baby!

[quote="luv2cook"]

Quote :

Lastly, Steinem, Im going to choose to not comment on your post outside of saying the following: While the womens movement helped women it also hurt them a great deal.


Saying anything further on this topic is only going to raise my blood pressure along with yours I suspect.

Nah, you wouldn't raise my pressure; but I don't wish you getting upset over differing opinions. We'll just agree to disagree.

steinem wrote:

Ratzilla wrote:

steinem wrote:

...I would simply hope you base your decsion on her politics, not because she's a woman. You can criticize Hill all you want, it doesn't offend me. What I don't understand is why some men think a woman shouldn't have an opinion, do they really want to spend his their life with a doormat? As for L2C and her need to hold back on feminist bashing, I guess she doesn't want to be represented by women in congress on women's issues (did you know insurance doesn't cover birth control but it covers Viagra, go figure) , she wants to work for less pay for doing the same job as her male counterpart and I guess she wouldn't care that she could have never voted had it not been for the early feminists. I have a whole list of freedoms early women fought for that she enjoys, but we're off topic so I'll cease and desist. But as women deserve same rights, again, they should be held to same standard of proper decorum and I'm glad to see the debate instructor that provoked Shanahan is being investigated too. I understand she's playing the race card now. Prejudice doesn't strike me as something Shanahan would be guilty of....

I don't have my opinions on Hillary because she's a female. I have them because she's an unpleasant, corrupt, and socialistic one. I'm not going to argue the pros and cons of feminism here either, but I believe the reason viagra would be covered by insurance and not birth control is likely because viagra is a corrective treatment to an involuntary medical problem where pregnancy is usually the result of voluntary activity and can be prevented without medications.

BC pills are used for medical issues other than birthcontrol; It's also used for dysmenorhea, regulating girls with dysfunctional periods, i.e overbleeding and irregular timing....etc, etc. In other words, it is used often for corrective treatment too. But again this is veering off topic....

So correct...... it comes back around to wild bill.... "He's a nut !!!" - Barney Fife

nitromaxx98 wrote:

2012, Billary is setting up for, nothing less....

Ya think? I have a feeling the "presumptive nominee" will be nothing more than that; Presumptive.
I think that with as close as the polls have become, many of the super delegates will jump ship, over to her...

But, this is off-topic.

About Shanahan: my husband thinks there's probably a clause in his contract that states something to the effect that he must maintain a certain decorum while representing the university and if he doesn't, if he violates that clause, it's grounds for termination, regardless of tenure.

Views: 211,180

steinem wrote:

nitromaxx98 wrote:

suck up....

Suck up?.... nah. He's wise. A man that treats right, gets treated right in return. Amazing what mutual respect will get you. S.Jay, You a real man, baby!

Sorry, I got lost in the real world.

steinem wrote:

BC pills are used for medical issues other than birthcontrol; It's also used for dysmenorhea, regulating girls with dysfunctional periods, i.e overbleeding and irregular timing....etc, etc. In other words, it is used often for corrective treatment too. But again this is veering off topic....

Maybe if you girls would yell obscenities and moon the top dogs at the insurance companies you might get noticed. Sure got Shanahan lots of attention. Funny that nobody realizes that's exactly why he acts so extreme.

I've never met Shanahan. But the Supreme Commandress took one of his classes as an undergrad... and to this day thinks he's a hell of a guy.

Personally, I admire a man who's willing to make an ass of himself now and then. The mooning was a little much... but nobody got hurt.

Bighead wrote:

The mooning was a little much... but nobody got hurt.

I suspect that you haven't talked to the people who had to see that ass head-on. Fortunately, the camera was off to the side.

they should do away with tenureship and wild bill is not the only nut on campus, there are plenty of so called teachers that do worse things then this guy did. And I seriously doubt if he gets fired may get slapped on the hand but thats it.....too close to the start of semester to find a replacement.

Three letters to the editor tonight in the HDN. Agreed with all 3 of them.

zeke wrote:

And I seriously doubt if he gets fired may get slapped on the hand but thats it.....too close to the start of semester to find a replacement.

I agree, Zeke, but not as to why he won't get fired. He brings some fame to FHSU; positive or negative, it doesn't matter. His tenure is solidified more than it has ever been.

So you're saying he's getting a pat on the back(side)?

I saw even Ole' Pattie Lowry said he must go using Wild Bill's arguement against him when he was against naming Sheridan Hall

well,, it took longer than some expected , but it would appear that pressure has been applied and the wild bill outburst on youtube has been removed. It's my guess that fast eddie and his lawyers forced it's removal thru some sort of legal wrangling , but whatever the case, it looks like it is getting swept under the rug and will soon be forgotton. out of sight , out of mind......

I am however finding other versions of it on youtube

stupid white haired father of fort hace

I found the video .